Ummm… Why are you bashing something no one has brought up? It’s as if you were trying to argue with an invisible person.

First off I would like to point out that power wise Ps3 is not much different from the 360. (Don’t argue the facts, if you know what your talking about there about the same power wise. Ps3 is more powerful but not but a lot.) Second, I would like to point out that it’s the games that make a system not specs… Obviously, or else Xbox would have won last Gens War. Third, personally like Xbox games to Ps3 games. Does that make me the devil? No. It means I have an opinion. If someone gets a Ps3 I’m not gonna scorn them I’m gonna accept they like the games on that system, no big deal. Fourth, I haven’t seen real stuff from Sony except about Metal Gear Solid and I-8 both of which probally won’t be launch titles. Fifth, I look forward to seeing the launch titles for the Ps3 and deciding if I should buy it.

So, don’t be a mentally retarted child and scream things such as, “i think ps3 is sick it’s better than sh*ty 360 iand i can’t wait to buy mine”. Sure it’s your opinion but it makes you look like a fanboyish fool by saying it.

Finally I can say what I really wanted to…
Now, if the PS3 is decoding the Blue-Ray through the Cell Processor whats left for the actual game computing? (I don’t want a Ps3 as a Movie Player only a Game machine) I’m pretty sure decoding the Blue-Ray at any worthwhile speed will take up at least one seventh of the Cell processor maybe more. Then add in Graphics, AI, Physics, all the code underneath of that stuff, just seems to be limiting the power of the Cell processor. Just a thought that popped into my head about the Ps3. It’s probally better for Sony since it’ll cut down on how much they lose because of BlueRay.

Next comment: "I would prefer if blu-ray was decoded th [...]"
Previous comment: "i think ps3 is sick it's better than sh* [...]"