Kutaragi never said PS3 was 3X more powerful than 360 but 2X, wich is still probably a lie. But, in terms of options, capacity, capability and so on, yes, PS3 seems 2X more “powerful” than the already exciting 360, which in my opinion is the new dreamcast of this generation:

It had the same very good graphics at the launch period, and then totally lost because launched too early: Dreamcast=no DVD. Everybody thought it was an uninteresting option, which proved to be absolutely wrong. Then with time, came MGS2 and other gorgeous games, that dreamcast just couldn’t deliver.

I think, the gap won’t be too big this time, but even with the same graphics/sound/gameplay quality games on both consoles, why choose the one with less interesting options and already from the past (no built in Wi-fi, no internal out of the box HD media reader, no memorysticks entries, no 1080p for at least movies on blue ray, no great interaction with psp etc etc.).

So to me, the choice is made: I really like the 360, nice and cool, but to many things missing for a true next gen expreience and a true all in one media center. now, I just hope SONY don’t screw everything up which is possible…

Next comment: "He did say that it was 2x as powerful, b [...]"
Previous comment: "Ken Kuturagi said the PS3 is 3x more pow [...]"